Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Sudan

Sudan: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita was 59.83 kilograms per year per capita in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
59.83 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
138th
of 191 countries
All-time high
77.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2015
All-time low
59.83 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Years of data
11
2012–2022

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Sudan, 2012–2022

0204060802012201720222012: 65 kilograms per year per capita2013: 64.4 kilograms per year per capita2014: 67 kilograms per year per capita2015: 77.1 kilograms per year per capita2016: 67.8 kilograms per year per capita2017: 62.9 kilograms per year per capita2018: 61.6 kilograms per year per capita2019: 60.4 kilograms per year per capita2020: 60.3 kilograms per year per capita2021: 60.2 kilograms per year per capita2022: 59.8 kilograms per year per capita

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Sudan is 59.83 kilograms per year per capita, measured in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and down 8.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Sudan peaked at 77.11 kilograms per year per capita in 2015 and was at its lowest, 59.83 kilograms per year per capita, in 2022.

Sudan ranks 138th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 65.78 kilograms per year per capita 60.43 kilograms per year per capita 77.11 kilograms per year per capita 8
2020s 60.12 kilograms per year per capita 59.83 kilograms per year per capita 60.33 kilograms per year per capita 3

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 135 Belize 60.93 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 136 Malaysia 59.99 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 137 Burkina Faso 59.85 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 139 Nicaragua 59.44 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 140 North Korea 58.61 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 141 Lithuania 58.04 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More economy & growth data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Sudan?
Fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Sudan was 59.83 kilograms per year per capita in 2022, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 77.11 kilograms per year per capita in 2015.
What is the lowest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 59.83 kilograms per year per capita in 2022.
How does Sudan rank for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Sudan ranks 138th out of 191 countries with data for 2022.
Is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.