Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Laos

Laos: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita was 132.78 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
132.78 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 8.6%
World rank
31st
of 191 countries
All-time high
148.34 kilograms per year per capita
in 2018
All-time low
20.57 kilograms per year per capita
in 1978
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Laos, 1961–2023

050100150196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

In 2023, fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Laos stood at 132.78 kilograms per year per capita.

That represents a change of up 8.6% on the previous year and up 64.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Laos peaked at 148.34 kilograms per year per capita in 2018 and was at its lowest, 20.57 kilograms per year per capita, in 1978.

Laos ranks 31st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 25.45 kilograms per year per capita 24.97 kilograms per year per capita 26.4 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 24 kilograms per year per capita 20.57 kilograms per year per capita 27.41 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 28.32 kilograms per year per capita 25.78 kilograms per year per capita 31.29 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 29.66 kilograms per year per capita 26.94 kilograms per year per capita 32.16 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 52.66 kilograms per year per capita 33.65 kilograms per year per capita 70.15 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 107.33 kilograms per year per capita 61.14 kilograms per year per capita 148.34 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 121.64 kilograms per year per capita 106.03 kilograms per year per capita 132.78 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Laos

  1. 28 Portugal 136.22 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 30 Peru 135.55 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 32 Gabon 131.3 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 33 Slovenia 131.06 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 34 Iceland 130.14 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More economy & growth data for Laos

All data for Laos →

Frequently asked questions

What is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Laos?
Fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Laos was 132.78 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Laos?
The highest recorded value was 148.34 kilograms per year per capita in 2018.
What is the lowest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Laos?
The lowest recorded value was 20.57 kilograms per year per capita in 1978.
How does Laos rank for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Laos ranks 31st out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
Is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Laos?
Over the last ten years it is up 64.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Laos data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.