Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Iraq

Iraq: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita was 47.59 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
47.59 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
down 16.3%
World rank
152nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
73.97 kilograms per year per capita
in 1978
All-time low
21.48 kilograms per year per capita
in 2004
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Iraq, 1961–2023

20406080196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Iraq recorded 47.59 kilograms per year per capita for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.3% on the previous year and up 35.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Iraq peaked at 73.97 kilograms per year per capita in 1978 and was at its lowest, 21.48 kilograms per year per capita, in 2004.

Iraq ranks 152nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 30.89 kilograms per year per capita 28.41 kilograms per year per capita 32.21 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 50.28 kilograms per year per capita 29.67 kilograms per year per capita 73.97 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 63.61 kilograms per year per capita 51.83 kilograms per year per capita 71.28 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 57.41 kilograms per year per capita 47.35 kilograms per year per capita 64.68 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 32.56 kilograms per year per capita 21.48 kilograms per year per capita 44.22 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 41.57 kilograms per year per capita 34.15 kilograms per year per capita 54.5 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 52.89 kilograms per year per capita 47.59 kilograms per year per capita 56.83 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Iraq

  1. 149 Nepal 51.26 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 150 South Korea 48.06 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 151 Georgia 47.76 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 153 Botswana 46.64 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 154 Guinea-Bissau 46.43 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 155 Namibia 46.39 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More economy & growth data for Iraq

All data for Iraq →

Frequently asked questions

What is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Iraq?
Fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Iraq was 47.59 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Iraq?
The highest recorded value was 73.97 kilograms per year per capita in 1978.
What is the lowest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Iraq?
The lowest recorded value was 21.48 kilograms per year per capita in 2004.
How does Iraq rank for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Iraq ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
Is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Iraq?
Over the last ten years it is up 35.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Iraq data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.