Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Bolivia
Bolivia: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita was 85.15 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Bolivia, 1961–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bolivia is 85.15 kilograms per year per capita, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.1% on the previous year and up 24.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bolivia peaked at 97.04 kilograms per year per capita in 2001 and was at its lowest, 59.84 kilograms per year per capita, in 1961.
Bolivia ranks 92nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73.68 kilograms per year per capita | 59.84 kilograms per year per capita | 82.34 kilograms per year per capita | 9 |
| 1970s | 85.91 kilograms per year per capita | 74.63 kilograms per year per capita | 94.75 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 1980s | 80.83 kilograms per year per capita | 67.04 kilograms per year per capita | 93.17 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 1990s | 88.91 kilograms per year per capita | 83.88 kilograms per year per capita | 93.14 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2000s | 77.86 kilograms per year per capita | 64.36 kilograms per year per capita | 97.04 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 82 kilograms per year per capita | 68.41 kilograms per year per capita | 92.93 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 87.56 kilograms per year per capita | 85.15 kilograms per year per capita | 89.83 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
More economy & growth data for Bolivia
- External balance on goods and services as a percent of GDP -4.1% (2024)
- Inflation of consumer prices 19.5% (2025)
- GDP per capita 2,957 constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Share of manufacturing in gross domestic product (GDP) 13.1% (2024)
- Gross domestic product (GDP) 37.21 billion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- GDP per capita in international and market dollars 2,957 constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- DEC alternative conversion factor 6.91 LCU per US$ (2025)
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) 8.22 billion current LCU (2025)
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) 1.19 billion current US$ (2025)
- Taxes less subsidies on products 24.85 billion current LCU (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bolivia?
- Fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bolivia was 85.15 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 97.04 kilograms per year per capita in 2001.
- What is the lowest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 59.84 kilograms per year per capita in 1961.
- How does Bolivia rank for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Bolivia ranks 92nd out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.