Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita was 91.32 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita in Azerbaijan, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Azerbaijan is 91.32 kilograms per year per capita, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 2.8% on the previous year and up 17.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Azerbaijan peaked at 93.93 kilograms per year per capita in 2022 and was at its lowest, 41.06 kilograms per year per capita, in 2004.
Azerbaijan ranks 84th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 70.54 kilograms per year per capita | 44.98 kilograms per year per capita | 88.77 kilograms per year per capita | 8 |
| 2000s | 55.54 kilograms per year per capita | 41.06 kilograms per year per capita | 63.02 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 74.77 kilograms per year per capita | 63.64 kilograms per year per capita | 86.26 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 92.61 kilograms per year per capita | 91.32 kilograms per year per capita | 93.93 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
- 81 Finland 92.17 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 82 United Kingdom 92.09 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 83 Venezuela 91.82 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 85 Libya 89.94 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 86 Morocco 88.99 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 87 Haiti 87.35 kilograms per year per capita compare
More economy & growth data for Azerbaijan
- External balance on goods and services as a percent of GDP 6.2% (2025)
- Inflation of consumer prices 5.6% (2025)
- GDP per capita 5,936 constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Share of manufacturing in gross domestic product (GDP) 6.0% (2025)
- Gross domestic product (GDP) 60.82 billion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- GDP per capita in international and market dollars 5,936 constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- DEC alternative conversion factor 1.7 LCU per US$ (2025)
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) 1.26 billion current LCU (2025)
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) 742.14 million current US$ (2025)
- Taxes less subsidies on products 12.40 billion current LCU (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Azerbaijan?
- Fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita in Azerbaijan was 91.32 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 93.93 kilograms per year per capita in 2022.
- What is the lowest fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 41.06 kilograms per year per capita in 2004.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Azerbaijan ranks 84th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.