Fruit consumption by type in Botswana

Botswana: Fruit consumption by type was 0.05 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.05 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
101st
of 184 countries
All-time high
0.197 kilograms per year per capita
in 2002
All-time low
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Fruit consumption by type in Botswana, 1961–2023

00.050.10.150.2196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Botswana recorded 0.05 kilograms per year per capita for fruit consumption by type in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 400.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fruit consumption by type in Botswana peaked at 0.197 kilograms per year per capita in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 kilograms per year per capita, in 1961.

Botswana ranks 101st of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 0 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 0.0063 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.0634 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 0.018 kilograms per year per capita 0.0105 kilograms per year per capita 0.042 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 0.0465 kilograms per year per capita 0.0098 kilograms per year per capita 0.197 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 0.023 kilograms per year per capita 0.01 kilograms per year per capita 0.08 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 0.0425 kilograms per year per capita 0.03 kilograms per year per capita 0.05 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Botswana

  1. 98 Romania 0.06 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 99 Hong Kong 0.06 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 100 Mongolia 0.06 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 102 New Caledonia 0.05 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 103 Namibia 0.04 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 104 Belize 0.04 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More economy & growth data for Botswana

All data for Botswana →

Frequently asked questions

What is fruit consumption by type in Botswana?
Fruit consumption by type in Botswana was 0.05 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fruit consumption by type recorded in Botswana?
The highest recorded value was 0.197 kilograms per year per capita in 2002.
What is the lowest fruit consumption by type recorded in Botswana?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kilograms per year per capita in 1961.
How does Botswana rank for fruit consumption by type?
Botswana ranks 101st out of 184 countries with data for 2023.
Is fruit consumption by type rising or falling in Botswana?
Over the last ten years it is up 400.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Botswana data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
185 places, 9,134 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.