Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square in High income
High income: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square was 10,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
10,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 57.8%
Rank
7th
of 47 groups
All-time high
51,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
All-time low
265.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square in High income, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
High income recorded 10,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square in 2023.
The figure is down 57.8% on the previous year and down 62.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square in High income peaked at 51,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 265.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
High income ranks 7th of 47 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square in High income, year by year
| Year | BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 265.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 310.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1972 | 354.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1973 | 445.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1974 | 540.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1975 | 560.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 448.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 1977 | 633.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1978 | 778.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1979 | 985.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1980 | 1,308 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1981 | 1,635 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1982 | 1,555 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1983 | 1,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1984 | 1,444 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1985 | 954.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 1986 | 2,060 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +115.7% |
| 1987 | 3,656 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +77.5% |
| 1988 | 4,206 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1989 | 5,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1990 | 6,230 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1991 | 4,150 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -33.4% |
| 1992 | 2,814 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 1993 | 3,357 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1994 | 3,835 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1995 | 5,287 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 1996 | 5,766 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1997 | 7,393 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1998 | 12,471 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +68.7% |
| 1999 | 20,260 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 2000 | 27,484 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 2001 | 14,235 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 2002 | 11,694 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2003 | 11,338 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2004 | 15,753 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 2005 | 24,688 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +56.7% |
| 2006 | 35,785 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 2007 | 51,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 2008 | 36,835 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 2009 | 21,857 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 2010 | 24,400 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2011 | 33,042 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 2012 | 27,843 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2013 | 28,812 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2014 | 26,005 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2015 | 42,235 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 2016 | 42,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 33,650 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2018 | 9,930 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -70.5% |
| 2019 | 27,227 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +174.2% |
| 2020 | 12,828 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 2021 | 34,622 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +169.9% |
| 2022 | 25,848 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2023 | 10,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -57.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 532.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 265.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 985.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2,318 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 954.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7,156 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 2,814 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 20,260 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 25,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 11,338 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 51,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 29,614 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 9,930 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 42,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 21,051 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 34,622 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 4 Malta 76.88 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Cayman Islands 50.39 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Macau, China 34.68 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Bahrain 9.03 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Bermuda 2.79 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Maldives 2.57 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 1.33 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for High income
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) 5.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 0.1461 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 1.22 trillion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 2.76 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 8,900 current US$ per person (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 0.1748 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0158 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -12.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 855.36 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 967.71 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square in High income?
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square in High income was 10,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 51,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was 265.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does High income rank for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
- High income ranks 7th out of 47 groups with data for 2023.
- Is foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 62.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows Balance of Payments database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), note: International Monetary Fund, Balance of Payments database, supplemented by data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and D
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.