Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization in Chile

Chile: Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization was 2 in 2014. β–² Rising

Latest (2014)
2
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
43rd
of 90 countries
All-time high
2
in 1974
All-time low
0
in 1973
Years of data
42
1973–2014

Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization in Chile, 1973–2014

00.511.521973199320141973: 01974: 21975: 21976: 21977: 21978: 21979: 21980: 21981: 21982: 11983: 11984: 11985: 21986: 21987: 21988: 21989: 21990: 21991: 21992: 21993: 21994: 21995: 21996: 21997: 21998: 21999: 22000: 22001: 22002: 22003: 22004: 22005: 22006: 22007: 22008: 22009: 22010: 22011: 22012: 22013: 22014: 2

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for domestic finance, s1 - privatization in Chile is 2, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 42 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, domestic finance, s1 - privatization in Chile peaked at 2 in 1974 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1973.

Chile ranks 43rd of 90 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 42 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 1.71 0 2 7
1980s 1.7 1 2 10
1990s 2 2 2 10
2000s 2 2 2 10
2010s 2 2 2 5

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 43 Belgium 2 compare
  2. 43 Bangladesh 2 compare
  3. 43 Switzerland 2 compare
  4. 43 Colombia 2 compare
  5. 43 Germany 2 compare
  6. 43 Dominican Republic 2 compare
  7. 43 Ecuador 2 compare
  8. 43 Spain 2 compare
  9. 43 Ghana 2 compare
  10. 43 Guatemala 2 compare
  11. 43 Israel 2 compare
  12. 43 Jamaica 2 compare
  13. 43 Japan 2 compare
  14. 43 Kazakhstan 2 compare
  15. 43 Kenya 2 compare
  16. 43 Korea 2 compare
  17. 43 Morocco 2 compare
  18. 43 Nepal 2 compare
  19. 43 Philippines 2 compare
  20. 43 Poland 2 compare
  21. 43 Portugal 2 compare
  22. 43 Tanzania 2 compare

See the full ranking of 90 places β†’

More economy & growth data for Chile

All data for Chile β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is domestic finance, s1 - privatization in Chile?
Domestic finance, s1 - privatization in Chile was 2 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest domestic finance, s1 - privatization recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 2 in 1974.
What is the lowest domestic finance, s1 - privatization recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1973.
How does Chile rank for domestic finance, s1 - privatization?
Chile ranks 43rd out of 90 countries with data for 2014.
Is domestic finance, s1 - privatization rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 42 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/domestic-finance-s1-privatization/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/domestic-finance-s1-privatization/chile/">Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization in Chile</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 3,443 data points, 1973–2014
Last refreshed

The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.