Divergence of GDP per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador
Ecuador: Divergence of GDP per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution was 10,639 2011$ in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Divergence of GDP per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador, 1870–2018
Source: Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in 2011$.
Analysis
In 2018, divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador stood at 10,639 2011$.
The figure is up 16.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador peaked at 11,036 2011$ in 2014 and was at its lowest, 760 2011$, in 1870.
Ecuador ranks 87th of 145 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Divergence of GDP per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 2011$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1870 | 760 2011$ | — |
| 1880 | 760 2011$ | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 893 2011$ | +17.5% |
| 1900 | 1,098 2011$ | +23.0% |
| 1901 | 1,121 2011$ | +2.1% |
| 1902 | 1,143 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1903 | 1,165 2011$ | +1.9% |
| 1904 | 1,189 2011$ | +2.1% |
| 1905 | 1,213 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1906 | 1,237 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1907 | 1,261 2011$ | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 1,299 2011$ | +3.0% |
| 1909 | 1,337 2011$ | +2.9% |
| 1910 | 1,379 2011$ | +3.1% |
| 1911 | 1,420 2011$ | +3.0% |
| 1912 | 1,462 2011$ | +3.0% |
| 1913 | 1,506 2011$ | +3.0% |
| 1914 | 1,537 2011$ | +2.1% |
| 1915 | 1,567 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1916 | 1,583 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1917 | 1,599 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1918 | 1,615 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1919 | 1,647 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1920 | 1,680 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1921 | 1,696 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1922 | 1,714 2011$ | +1.1% |
| 1923 | 1,731 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1924 | 1,749 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1925 | 1,765 2011$ | +0.9% |
| 1926 | 1,784 2011$ | +1.1% |
| 1927 | 1,836 2011$ | +2.9% |
| 1928 | 1,892 2011$ | +3.1% |
| 1929 | 1,948 2011$ | +3.0% |
| 1930 | 1,969 2011$ | +1.1% |
| 1931 | 1,929 2011$ | -2.0% |
| 1932 | 1,890 2011$ | -2.0% |
| 1933 | 1,890 2011$ | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 1,890 2011$ | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1,890 2011$ | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1,908 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1937 | 1,927 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1938 | 1,948 2011$ | +1.1% |
| 1939 | 1,967 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1940 | 2,050 2011$ | +4.2% |
| 1941 | 2,016 2011$ | -1.7% |
| 1942 | 2,056 2011$ | +2.0% |
| 1943 | 2,259 2011$ | +9.9% |
| 1944 | 2,230 2011$ | -1.3% |
| 1945 | 2,182 2011$ | -2.2% |
| 1946 | 2,381 2011$ | +9.1% |
| 1947 | 2,571 2011$ | +8.0% |
| 1948 | 2,844 2011$ | +10.6% |
| 1949 | 2,815 2011$ | -1.0% |
| 1950 | 2,970 2011$ | +5.5% |
| 1951 | 2,925 2011$ | -1.5% |
| 1952 | 3,202 2011$ | +9.5% |
| 1953 | 3,185 2011$ | -0.5% |
| 1954 | 3,352 2011$ | +5.2% |
| 1955 | 3,349 2011$ | -0.1% |
| 1956 | 3,381 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 1957 | 3,437 2011$ | +1.7% |
| 1958 | 3,441 2011$ | +0.1% |
| 1959 | 3,524 2011$ | +2.4% |
| 1960 | 3,649 2011$ | +3.5% |
| 1961 | 3,633 2011$ | -0.4% |
| 1962 | 3,716 2011$ | +2.3% |
| 1963 | 3,698 2011$ | -0.5% |
| 1964 | 3,843 2011$ | +3.9% |
| 1965 | 4,090 2011$ | +6.4% |
| 1966 | 4,074 2011$ | -0.4% |
| 1967 | 4,163 2011$ | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 4,264 2011$ | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 4,366 2011$ | +2.4% |
| 1970 | 4,535 2011$ | +3.9% |
| 1971 | 4,658 2011$ | +2.7% |
| 1972 | 4,801 2011$ | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 5,244 2011$ | +9.2% |
| 1974 | 5,392 2011$ | +2.8% |
| 1975 | 5,514 2011$ | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 5,877 2011$ | +6.6% |
| 1977 | 6,073 2011$ | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 6,314 2011$ | +4.0% |
| 1979 | 6,472 2011$ | +2.5% |
| 1980 | 6,582 2011$ | +1.7% |
| 1981 | 6,664 2011$ | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 6,558 2011$ | -1.6% |
| 1983 | 6,252 2011$ | -4.7% |
| 1984 | 6,336 2011$ | +1.3% |
| 1985 | 6,433 2011$ | +1.5% |
| 1986 | 6,452 2011$ | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 5,893 2011$ | -8.7% |
| 1988 | 6,357 2011$ | +7.9% |
| 1989 | 6,207 2011$ | -2.4% |
| 1990 | 6,221 2011$ | +0.2% |
| 1991 | 6,513 2011$ | +4.7% |
| 1992 | 6,715 2011$ | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 6,770 2011$ | +0.8% |
| 1994 | 6,940 2011$ | +2.5% |
| 1995 | 6,985 2011$ | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 6,994 2011$ | +0.1% |
| 1997 | 7,181 2011$ | +2.7% |
| 1998 | 7,307 2011$ | +1.8% |
| 1999 | 6,885 2011$ | -5.8% |
| 2000 | 6,908 2011$ | +0.3% |
| 2001 | 7,131 2011$ | +3.2% |
| 2002 | 7,360 2011$ | +3.2% |
| 2003 | 7,468 2011$ | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 7,959 2011$ | +6.6% |
| 2005 | 8,257 2011$ | +3.7% |
| 2006 | 8,522 2011$ | +3.2% |
| 2007 | 8,634 2011$ | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 9,104 2011$ | +5.4% |
| 2009 | 9,081 2011$ | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 9,327 2011$ | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 9,985 2011$ | +7.1% |
| 2012 | 10,398 2011$ | +4.1% |
| 2013 | 10,760 2011$ | +3.5% |
| 2014 | 11,036 2011$ | +2.6% |
| 2015 | 10,905 2011$ | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 10,527 2011$ | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 10,637 2011$ | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 10,639 2011$ | +0.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 10,639 2011$ is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 13,242 2011$, 80% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 10,639 2011$ is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 12,153 2011$, 88% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 760 2011$ | 760 2011$ | 760 2011$ | 1 |
| 1880s | 760 2011$ | 760 2011$ | 760 2011$ | 1 |
| 1890s | 893 2011$ | 893 2011$ | 893 2011$ | 1 |
| 1900s | 1,206 2011$ | 1,098 2011$ | 1,337 2011$ | 10 |
| 1910s | 1,532 2011$ | 1,379 2011$ | 1,647 2011$ | 10 |
| 1920s | 1,780 2011$ | 1,680 2011$ | 1,948 2011$ | 10 |
| 1930s | 1,921 2011$ | 1,890 2011$ | 1,969 2011$ | 10 |
| 1940s | 2,340 2011$ | 2,016 2011$ | 2,844 2011$ | 10 |
| 1950s | 3,277 2011$ | 2,925 2011$ | 3,524 2011$ | 10 |
| 1960s | 3,950 2011$ | 3,633 2011$ | 4,366 2011$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 5,488 2011$ | 4,535 2011$ | 6,472 2011$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 6,373 2011$ | 5,893 2011$ | 6,664 2011$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 6,851 2011$ | 6,221 2011$ | 7,307 2011$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 8,042 2011$ | 6,908 2011$ | 9,104 2011$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 10,468 2011$ | 9,327 2011$ | 11,036 2011$ | 9 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 84 Tunisia 11,354 2011$ compare
- 85 Uzbekistan 11,220 2011$ compare
- 86 Albania 11,104 2011$ compare
- 88 Saint Lucia 10,475 2011$ compare
- 89 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10,460 2011$ compare
- 90 Ukraine 9,813 2011$ compare
More economy & growth data for Ecuador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 0 BoP, current US$ (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 0 BoP, current US$ per person (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.30 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 191.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.01 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 71.04 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 41.84 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador?
- Divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution in Ecuador was 10,639 2011$ in 2018, according to Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 11,036 2011$ in 2014.
- What is the lowest divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 760 2011$ in 1870.
- How does Ecuador rank for divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution?
- Ecuador ranks 87th out of 145 countries with data for 2018.
- Is divergence of gdp per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Divergence of GDP per capita among latecomers to the capitalist revolution. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Unit 1 'The capitalist revolution: prosperity, inequality, and planetary limits’ in The CORE Team, The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics. Available at: https://tinyco.re/4329598 [Figure 1.19]