Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual in Chile
Chile: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual was -151 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual in Chile, 1961–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Chile recorded -151 % change on previous year for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual in 2025.
That represents a change of down 341.4% on the previous year and down 205.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual in Chile peaked at 665 % change on previous year in 2009 and was at its lowest, -881.7 % change on previous year, in 1998.
That places Chile 157th out of 173 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 6.79 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | 17.29 % change on previous year | +154.5% |
| 1963 | 9.56 % change on previous year | -44.7% |
| 1964 | 29.98 % change on previous year | +213.5% |
| 1965 | -1.87 % change on previous year | -106.2% |
| 1966 | 62.57 % change on previous year | -3453.9% |
| 1967 | 15.97 % change on previous year | -74.5% |
| 1968 | 35.06 % change on previous year | +119.6% |
| 1969 | 46.3 % change on previous year | +32.0% |
| 1970 | 36.89 % change on previous year | -20.3% |
| 1971 | -13.25 % change on previous year | -135.9% |
| 1972 | 334.11 % change on previous year | -2621.5% |
| 1973 | 631.31 % change on previous year | +89.0% |
| 1974 | 590.01 % change on previous year | -6.5% |
| 1975 | 364.26 % change on previous year | -38.3% |
| 1976 | 190.91 % change on previous year | -47.6% |
| 1977 | 139.1 % change on previous year | -27.1% |
| 1978 | 64.57 % change on previous year | -53.6% |
| 1979 | 51.12 % change on previous year | -20.8% |
| 1980 | 19.3 % change on previous year | -62.3% |
| 1981 | -17.13 % change on previous year | -188.8% |
| 1982 | -13.69 % change on previous year | -20.1% |
| 1983 | 56.29 % change on previous year | -511.3% |
| 1984 | -25.41 % change on previous year | -145.1% |
| 1985 | 414.33 % change on previous year | -1730.4% |
| 1986 | 9.18 % change on previous year | -97.8% |
| 1987 | 19.69 % change on previous year | +114.5% |
| 1988 | -58.19 % change on previous year | -395.5% |
| 1989 | -78.16 % change on previous year | +34.3% |
| 1990 | -18.15 % change on previous year | -76.8% |
| 1991 | -184.59 % change on previous year | +916.9% |
| 1993 | -179.3 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 1994 | -63.23 % change on previous year | -64.7% |
| 1995 | -77.22 % change on previous year | +22.1% |
| 1996 | 100 % change on previous year | -229.5% |
| 1997 | 125.3 % change on previous year | +25.3% |
| 1998 | -881.7 % change on previous year | -803.7% |
| 1999 | 550.47 % change on previous year | -162.4% |
| 2000 | -177.1 % change on previous year | -132.2% |
| 2001 | -10.69 % change on previous year | -94.0% |
| 2002 | 30.78 % change on previous year | -388.0% |
| 2003 | -153.04 % change on previous year | -597.2% |
| 2004 | 60.25 % change on previous year | -139.4% |
| 2005 | 81.33 % change on previous year | +35.0% |
| 2006 | -236.52 % change on previous year | -390.8% |
| 2007 | 139.29 % change on previous year | -158.9% |
| 2008 | 44.51 % change on previous year | -68.0% |
| 2009 | 665 % change on previous year | +1393.9% |
| 2010 | -61.4 % change on previous year | -109.2% |
| 2011 | -155.28 % change on previous year | +152.9% |
| 2012 | -96.87 % change on previous year | -37.6% |
| 2013 | 205.82 % change on previous year | -312.5% |
| 2014 | -293.99 % change on previous year | -242.8% |
| 2015 | 143.38 % change on previous year | -148.8% |
| 2016 | 7.58 % change on previous year | -94.7% |
| 2017 | -88.42 % change on previous year | -1266.2% |
| 2019 | 215.86 % change on previous year | -344.1% |
| 2020 | -29.91 % change on previous year | -113.9% |
| 2021 | -111.92 % change on previous year | +274.2% |
| 2022 | -241.59 % change on previous year | +115.9% |
| 2023 | -79.38 % change on previous year | -67.1% |
| 2024 | 62.56 % change on previous year | -178.8% |
| 2025 | -151 % change on previous year | -341.4% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's -151 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -0.2597 % change on previous year, 581.5× the median. (60 countries reporting)
- Chile's -151 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 16.18 % change on previous year. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | +3453.9% | -1.87 % change on previous year | 62.57 % change on previous year |
| 1972 | +2621.5% | -13.25 % change on previous year | 334.11 % change on previous year |
| 1985 | +1730.4% | -25.41 % change on previous year | 414.33 % change on previous year |
| 2009 | +1393.9% | 44.51 % change on previous year | 665 % change on previous year |
| 2017 | -1266.2% | 7.58 % change on previous year | -88.42 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.63 % change on previous year | -1.87 % change on previous year | 62.57 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1970s | 238.9 % change on previous year | -13.25 % change on previous year | 631.31 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 32.62 % change on previous year | -78.16 % change on previous year | 414.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -69.83 % change on previous year | -881.7 % change on previous year | 550.47 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 44.38 % change on previous year | -236.52 % change on previous year | 665 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -13.7 % change on previous year | -293.99 % change on previous year | 215.86 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2020s | -91.87 % change on previous year | -241.59 % change on previous year | 62.56 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 154 Namibia -124.01 % change on previous year compare
- 155 Lao People's Democratic Republic -128.73 % change on previous year compare
- 156 Botswana -146.36 % change on previous year compare
- 158 Côte d'Ivoire -200 % change on previous year compare
- 158 Italy -200 % change on previous year compare
- 158 Lebanon -200 % change on previous year compare
- 158 Nicaragua -200 % change on previous year compare
More economy & growth data for Chile
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.32 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 8.68 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0243 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 437.31 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 14.51 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 10.75 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0406 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 730.79 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 11.37 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual in Chile?
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual in Chile was -151 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 665 % change on previous year in 2009.
- What is the lowest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -881.7 % change on previous year in 1998.
- How does Chile rank for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual?
- Chile ranks 157th out of 173 countries with data for 2025.
- Is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 205.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.