Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Female in Latvia
Latvia: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Female was 100 % in 2021. ▬ Flat
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Female in Latvia, 2006–2021
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2021, completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female in Latvia stood at 100 %. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female in Latvia peaked at 100 % in 2016 and was at its lowest, 95.09 %, in 2019.
Latvia ranks 1st of 72 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Female in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 99.71 % | — |
| 2007 | 97.84 % | -1.9% |
| 2008 | 96.26 % | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 97.87 % | +1.7% |
| 2010 | 98.09 % | +0.2% |
| 2011 | 99.3 % | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 98.31 % | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 99.75 % | +1.5% |
| 2014 | 99.41 % | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 99.76 % | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 100 % | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 99.17 % | -0.8% |
| 2018 | 100 % | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 95.09 % | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 100 % | +5.2% |
| 2021 | 100 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.92 % | 96.26 % | 99.71 % | 4 |
| 2010s | 98.89 % | 95.09 % | 100 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 2 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More economy & growth data for Latvia
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per capita 1,898 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), annual 11.34 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per 0.1868 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per 4,916 current US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), annual 6.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per 0.1654 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per 4,351 current LCU per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 4.38 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.1132 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 2,979 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female in Latvia?
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female in Latvia was 100 % in 2021, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2016.
- What is the lowest completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 95.09 % in 2019.
- How does Latvia rank for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female?
- Latvia ranks 1st out of 72 countries with data for 2021.
- Is completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — female rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.