Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per in El Salvador
El Salvador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per was 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per in El Salvador, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per in El Salvador stood at 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.3% on the previous year and up 26.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per in El Salvador peaked at 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 17,247 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1966.
El Salvador ranks 146th of 203 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 17,418 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 17,247 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1967 | 18,028 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1968 | 18,112 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1969 | 18,245 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1970 | 21,974 current LCU per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1971 | 22,298 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1972 | 23,068 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1973 | 27,551 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1974 | 29,794 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1975 | 31,929 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1976 | 44,199 current LCU per square kilometre | +38.4% |
| 1977 | 61,056 current LCU per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1978 | 55,911 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1979 | 65,031 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1980 | 65,473 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1981 | 57,048 current LCU per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1982 | 53,471 current LCU per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1983 | 52,765 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1984 | 51,147 current LCU per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1985 | 49,360 current LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1986 | 49,929 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1987 | 39,645 current LCU per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1988 | 42,415 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1989 | 38,637 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1990 | 37,233 current LCU per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1991 | 40,032 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1992 | 36,376 current LCU per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1993 | 41,039 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1994 | 46,187 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1995 | 49,643 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1996 | 50,200 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1997 | 53,844 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1998 | 49,976 current LCU per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1999 | 43,207 current LCU per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2000 | 40,797 current LCU per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2001 | 39,637 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2002 | 35,590 current LCU per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2003 | 35,081 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 37,942 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2005 | 43,779 current LCU per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2006 | 46,688 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2007 | 57,416 current LCU per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 2008 | 61,549 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2009 | 56,650 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2010 | 62,161 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2011 | 71,759 current LCU per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2012 | 67,238 current LCU per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2013 | 59,576 current LCU per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2014 | 63,974 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2015 | 62,552 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2016 | 66,925 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2017 | 65,016 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 64,459 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2019 | 66,767 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2020 | 64,405 current LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2021 | 67,453 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2022 | 70,120 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2023 | 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
El Salvador compared with similar countries
- El Salvador's 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 641,738 current LCU per square kilometre, 12% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- El Salvador's 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 277,288 current LCU per square kilometre, 27% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,810 current LCU per square kilometre | 17,247 current LCU per square kilometre | 18,245 current LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 38,281 current LCU per square kilometre | 21,974 current LCU per square kilometre | 65,031 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 49,989 current LCU per square kilometre | 38,637 current LCU per square kilometre | 65,473 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 44,774 current LCU per square kilometre | 36,376 current LCU per square kilometre | 53,844 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 45,513 current LCU per square kilometre | 35,081 current LCU per square kilometre | 61,549 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 65,043 current LCU per square kilometre | 59,576 current LCU per square kilometre | 71,759 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 69,306 current LCU per square kilometre | 64,405 current LCU per square kilometre | 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
- 143 Spain 78,117 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 144 France 77,869 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 145 Belarus 77,838 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 147 Liechtenstein 73,750 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 148 United Kingdom 73,736 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 149 Mauritania 72,767 current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for El Salvador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.92 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 318.29 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0087 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 50 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 763.72 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -27.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0208 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 119.98 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 30 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per in El Salvador?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per in El Salvador was 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 75,244 current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 17,247 current LCU per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does El Salvador rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
- El Salvador ranks 146th out of 203 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.