Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Belarus
Belarus: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▼ Falling
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Belarus, 1990–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Belarus stood at 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 15.2% on the previous year and down 30.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Belarus peaked at 0.6496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places Belarus 111th out of 197 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 36 years of available data.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Belarus, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.6453 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0.5875 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1992 | 0.5862 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1993 | 0.6198 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 1994 | 0.5681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1995 | 0.5923 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 1996 | 0.5793 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1997 | 0.5622 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1998 | 0.514 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1999 | 0.5983 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +16.4% |
| 2000 | 0.6213 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.6496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 2002 | 0.5658 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2003 | 0.4983 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2004 | 0.4347 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2005 | 0.3412 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -21.5% |
| 2006 | 0.2954 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 2007 | 0.2528 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 2008 | 0.2046 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2009 | 0.245 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 2010 | 0.2228 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2011 | 0.2217 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2012 | 0.2212 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.1854 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 2014 | 0.1822 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 0.2482 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +36.2% |
| 2016 | 0.3051 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +23.0% |
| 2017 | 0.2778 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2018 | 0.2445 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 2019 | 0.2345 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2020 | 0.2579 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +9.9% |
| 2021 | 0.2178 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 2022 | 0.2112 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2023 | 0.2149 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2024 | 0.2049 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2025 | 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5853 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.514 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.6453 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4109 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.2046 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.6496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2343 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.1822 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.3051 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2134 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.2579 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 108 Malaysia 0.2238 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 109 Suriname 0.207 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 110 Timor-Leste 0.1775 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 112 Botswana 0.1662 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 113 Marshall Islands 0.159 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 114 Tunisia 0.1589 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
More economy & growth data for Belarus
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.52 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.07 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 175.69 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0019 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 19.34 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.60 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -7.77 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0171 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 176.27 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 62.92 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Belarus?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Belarus was 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1738 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Belarus rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Belarus ranks 111th out of 197 countries with data for 2025.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.