Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Tunisia
Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Tunisia, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Tunisia is 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.2% on the previous year and up 7.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Tunisia peaked at 58,546 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 7,424 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1967.
Tunisia ranks 142nd of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 9,296 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 8,311 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1967 | 7,424 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1968 | 9,198 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1969 | 8,870 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1970 | 9,493 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1971 | 11,727 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1972 | 15,001 constant LCU per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 1973 | 13,547 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1974 | 15,218 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1975 | 16,102 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1976 | 16,829 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1977 | 15,145 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1978 | 16,041 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1979 | 15,276 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1980 | 16,782 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1981 | 17,879 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1982 | 16,035 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1983 | 16,436 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 18,550 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1985 | 21,771 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1986 | 19,120 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1987 | 23,046 constant LCU per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 1988 | 17,099 constant LCU per square kilometre | -25.8% |
| 1989 | 18,971 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1990 | 24,723 constant LCU per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 1991 | 28,161 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1992 | 29,698 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1993 | 28,196 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1994 | 25,384 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1995 | 22,869 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1996 | 29,626 constant LCU per square kilometre | +29.5% |
| 1997 | 30,505 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1998 | 30,925 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1999 | 34,324 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2000 | 34,193 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2001 | 33,318 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2002 | 30,016 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2003 | 35,348 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2004 | 40,125 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2005 | 36,992 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2006 | 39,918 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2007 | 40,249 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 39,984 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2009 | 43,674 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2010 | 39,706 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2011 | 44,224 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2012 | 48,101 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2013 | 45,707 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2014 | 49,958 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2015 | 53,213 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2016 | 49,138 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2017 | 52,019 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2018 | 55,076 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2019 | 58,339 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2020 | 58,546 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 57,181 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2022 | 58,361 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2023 | 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.2% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 897,981 constant LCU per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 180,084 constant LCU per square kilometre, 27% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,620 constant LCU per square kilometre | 7,424 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9,296 constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 14,438 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9,493 constant LCU per square kilometre | 16,829 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 18,569 constant LCU per square kilometre | 16,035 constant LCU per square kilometre | 23,046 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 28,441 constant LCU per square kilometre | 22,869 constant LCU per square kilometre | 34,324 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 37,382 constant LCU per square kilometre | 30,016 constant LCU per square kilometre | 43,674 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 49,548 constant LCU per square kilometre | 39,706 constant LCU per square kilometre | 58,339 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 55,745 constant LCU per square kilometre | 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre | 58,546 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 139 Saudi Arabia 52,244 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 140 Bahrain 52,225 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 141 Austria 51,405 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 143 Greece 48,774 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 144 Lesotho 46,051 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 145 Luxembourg 44,787 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Tunisia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 0.5829 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.22 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 34.59 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0007 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 2.82 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 759.60 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 7.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0148 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 61.87 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 1.12 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Tunisia?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Tunisia was 48,890 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 58,546 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 7,424 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Tunisia rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Tunisia ranks 142nd out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.