Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Mexico
Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 427,327 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Mexico, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mexico recorded 427,327 constant LCU per square kilometre for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 1.1% on the previous year and up 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Mexico peaked at 432,193 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 135,564 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Mexico 82nd out of 194 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Mexico, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 135,564 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 138,659 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1967 | 140,416 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1968 | 143,052 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1969 | 144,675 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1970 | 150,695 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1971 | 159,473 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1972 | 160,571 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1973 | 167,015 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1974 | 171,203 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1975 | 174,542 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1976 | 176,329 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 189,987 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1978 | 201,491 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1979 | 197,134 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1980 | 211,278 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1981 | 227,762 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1982 | 222,665 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1983 | 227,147 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 230,509 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1985 | 237,529 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1986 | 234,494 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1987 | 237,465 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1988 | 229,457 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1989 | 226,333 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1990 | 242,584 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1991 | 248,093 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1992 | 242,731 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1993 | 255,071 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1994 | 254,627 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1995 | 257,735 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1996 | 267,539 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1997 | 267,402 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1998 | 275,976 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1999 | 279,376 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 282,536 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2001 | 297,243 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2002 | 293,883 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2003 | 304,780 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2004 | 312,414 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2005 | 302,764 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2006 | 320,945 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2007 | 334,957 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2008 | 337,624 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 328,236 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2010 | 336,181 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2011 | 328,045 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2012 | 347,907 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2013 | 358,397 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2014 | 369,704 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2015 | 376,555 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 387,533 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2017 | 400,196 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2018 | 410,039 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2019 | 411,264 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 415,870 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2021 | 425,530 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2022 | 432,193 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2023 | 427,327 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.1% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 427,327 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 302,333 constant LCU per square kilometre, 1.4× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 427,327 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 174,468 constant LCU per square kilometre, 2.4× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 140,473 constant LCU per square kilometre | 135,564 constant LCU per square kilometre | 144,675 constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 174,844 constant LCU per square kilometre | 150,695 constant LCU per square kilometre | 201,491 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 228,464 constant LCU per square kilometre | 211,278 constant LCU per square kilometre | 237,529 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 259,113 constant LCU per square kilometre | 242,584 constant LCU per square kilometre | 279,376 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 311,538 constant LCU per square kilometre | 282,536 constant LCU per square kilometre | 337,624 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 372,582 constant LCU per square kilometre | 328,045 constant LCU per square kilometre | 411,264 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 425,230 constant LCU per square kilometre | 415,870 constant LCU per square kilometre | 432,193 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 79 Syria 485,945 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 80 Algeria 485,120 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 81 Ukraine 439,480 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 83 Netherlands 422,875 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 84 Central African Republic 407,854 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 85 Kyrgyzstan 367,825 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Mexico
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.43 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.06 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 11.29 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0062 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 85.55 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 43.09 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -5.25 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0235 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 326.53 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 10.41 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Mexico?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Mexico was 427,327 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 432,193 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 135,564 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Mexico rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Mexico ranks 82nd out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.