2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern Europe
Northern Europe: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 44 % in 2025. ▼ Falling
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern Europe, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Northern Europe recorded 44 % for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in 2025.
The figure is up 2.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern Europe peaked at 55 % in 2002 and was at its lowest, 43 %, in 2013.
Northern Europe ranks 5th of 29 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern Europe, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 45 % | — |
| 2001 | 45 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 55 % | +22.2% |
| 2003 | 54 % | -1.8% |
| 2004 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 53 % | -1.9% |
| 2008 | 54 % | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 54 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 55 % | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 55 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 44 % | -20.0% |
| 2013 | 43 % | -2.3% |
| 2014 | 43 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 43 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 44 % | +2.3% |
| 2017 | 43 % | -2.3% |
| 2018 | 44 % | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 44 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 44 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 44 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 45 % | +2.3% |
| 2023 | 44 % | -2.2% |
| 2024 | 44 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 44 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.2 % | 45 % | 55 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 45.8 % | 43 % | 55 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 44.17 % | 44 % | 45 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Northern Europe
- 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 14 % compare
- 4 Türkiye 7 % compare
- 5 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
- 5 Djibouti 67 % compare
- 5 Republic of Moldova 0 %
- 5 Sweden 67 % compare
- 5 Syrian Arab Republic 0 %
- 5 United Republic of Tanzania 0 % compare
- 5 Viet Nam 0 %
- 7 Belgium 63 % compare
- 8 Zimbabwe 60 % compare
More economy & growth data for Northern Europe
- Gross Domestic Product, GDP in millions constant 2021 international $ 6.84 million (2027)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 6.26 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 1.08 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 57,638 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita, 2015 prices 51,132 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices 5.56 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ 6.15 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita 5.5 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 1.13 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 19.37 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern Europe?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Northern Europe was 44 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Northern Europe?
- The highest recorded value was 55 % in 2002.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Northern Europe?
- The lowest recorded value was 43 % in 2013.
- How does Northern Europe rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Northern Europe ranks 5th out of 29 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Northern Europe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Northern Europe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.