2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Iran (Islamic Republic of): 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 14 % in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Iran (Islamic Republic of), 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Iran (Islamic Republic of) recorded 14 % for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in 2025.
The figure is down 72.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Iran (Islamic Republic of) peaked at 50 % in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2000.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Iran (Islamic Republic of), year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 % | — |
| 2001 | 0 % | — |
| 2002 | 0 % | — |
| 2003 | 22 % | — |
| 2004 | 22 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 22 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 22 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 22 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 22 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 22 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 % | +127.3% |
| 2011 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0 % | -100.0% |
| 2023 | 14 % | — |
| 2024 | 14 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 14 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.4 % | 0 % | 22 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 50 % | 50 % | 50 % | 3 |
| 2020s | 10.5 % | 0 % | 14 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100 % compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
- 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 100 % compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100 % compare
- 4 Türkiye 7 % compare
- 5 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
- 5 Djibouti 67 % compare
- 5 Republic of Moldova 0 %
- 5 Sweden 67 % compare
- 5 Syrian Arab Republic 0 %
- 5 United Republic of Tanzania 0 % compare
- 5 Viet Nam 0 %
More economy & growth data for Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 18.14 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency 52.90 billion million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ 118,690 million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 2.84 billion million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 97,864 million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 26.74 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local Currency 37.9 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$, 2015 prices 1.86 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 10.2 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita, 2015 prices 1.96 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Iran (Islamic Republic of) was 14 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- The highest recorded value was 50 % in 2010.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2000.
- How does Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 3rd out of 9 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 72.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iran (Islamic Republic of) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.