2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe

Europe: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 51 % in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
51 %
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
2nd
of 29 groups
All-time high
54 %
in 2011
All-time low
45 %
in 2000
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe, 2000–2025

02040602000201220252000: 45 %2001: 48 %2002: 51 %2003: 52 %2004: 51 %2005: 51 %2006: 52 %2007: 52 %2008: 52 %2009: 53 %2010: 53 %2011: 54 %2012: 51 %2013: 51 %2014: 51 %2015: 51 %2016: 52 %2017: 52 %2018: 52 %2019: 52 %2020: 52 %2021: 53 %2022: 52 %2023: 51 %2024: 51 %2025: 51 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Europe recorded 51 % for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in 2025.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe peaked at 54 % in 2011 and was at its lowest, 45 %, in 2000.

Europe ranks 2nd of 29 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Europe, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 45 %
2001 48 % +6.7%
2002 51 % +6.2%
2003 52 % +2.0%
2004 51 % -1.9%
2005 51 % +0.0%
2006 52 % +2.0%
2007 52 % +0.0%
2008 52 % +0.0%
2009 53 % +1.9%
2010 53 % +0.0%
2011 54 % +1.9%
2012 51 % -5.6%
2013 51 % +0.0%
2014 51 % +0.0%
2015 51 % +0.0%
2016 52 % +2.0%
2017 52 % +0.0%
2018 52 % +0.0%
2019 52 % +0.0%
2020 52 % +0.0%
2021 53 % +1.9%
2022 52 % -1.9%
2023 51 % -1.9%
2024 51 % +0.0%
2025 51 % +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 50.7 % 45 % 53 % 10
2010s 51.9 % 51 % 54 % 10
2020s 51.67 % 51 % 53 % 6

Countries ranked near Europe

  1. 1 Belarus 100 % compare
  2. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100 % compare
  3. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
  4. 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 100 % compare
  5. 1 Nicaragua 100 % compare
  6. 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 14 % compare
  7. 4 Türkiye 7 % compare
  8. 5 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
  9. 5 Djibouti 67 % compare
  10. 5 Republic of Moldova 0 %
  11. 5 Sweden 67 % compare
  12. 5 Syrian Arab Republic 0 %
  13. 5 United Republic of Tanzania 0 % compare
  14. 5 Viet Nam 0 %

See the full ranking of 158 places →

More economy & growth data for Europe

All data for Europe →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe?
2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe was 51 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Europe?
The highest recorded value was 54 % in 2011.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Europe?
The lowest recorded value was 45 % in 2000.
How does Europe rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
Europe ranks 2nd out of 29 groups with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Europe?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Europe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/europe/">2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Europe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 2,975 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.