2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia
Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 13 % in 2017. ▼ Falling
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia, 2000–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia recorded 13 % for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in 2017.
The figure is up 44.4% on the previous year and down 27.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia peaked at 18 % in 2007 and was at its lowest, 9 %, in 2016.
Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia ranks 22nd of 29 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 17 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 17.31 % | — |
| 2001 | 17.65 % | +2.0% |
| 2003 | 15.38 % | -12.9% |
| 2004 | 15 % | -2.5% |
| 2005 | 15 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 16 % | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 18 % | +12.5% |
| 2008 | 18 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 14 % | -22.2% |
| 2010 | 13 % | -7.1% |
| 2011 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 11 % | -15.4% |
| 2013 | 12 % | +9.1% |
| 2014 | 12 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 13 % | +8.3% |
| 2016 | 9 % | -30.8% |
| 2017 | 13 % | +44.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.26 % | 14 % | 18 % | 9 |
| 2010s | 12 % | 9 % | 13 % | 8 |
Countries ranked near Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia
More economy & growth data for Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value 231 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value 152 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value 229 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value 605 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value 1,411 No (2025)
- 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value 1,447 No (2025)
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) 18.7 % (2023)
- 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of 32 % (2025)
- 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value 2.6 % (2020)
- 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements 8,596 No (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia was 13 % in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 18 % in 2007.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 9 % in 2016.
- How does Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia ranks 22nd out of 29 groups with data for 2017.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.