2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World
World: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 62.61 % in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World stood at 62.61 %.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and down 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World peaked at 71 % in 2018 and was at its lowest, 60 %, in 2000.
That places World 11th out of 31 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 60 % | — |
| 2001 | 62 % | +3.3% |
| 2002 | 63 % | +1.6% |
| 2003 | 62 % | -1.6% |
| 2004 | 64 % | +3.2% |
| 2005 | 64 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 63 % | -1.6% |
| 2007 | 64 % | +1.6% |
| 2008 | 63 % | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 64 % | +1.6% |
| 2010 | 63 % | -1.6% |
| 2011 | 64 % | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 64 % | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 64.99 % | +1.5% |
| 2014 | 64.86 % | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 66.37 % | +2.3% |
| 2016 | 69.96 % | +5.4% |
| 2017 | 69.56 % | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 71 % | +2.1% |
| 2019 | 70.21 % | -1.1% |
| 2020 | 69.77 % | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 61.78 % | -11.5% |
| 2022 | 62.25 % | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 61.8 % | -0.7% |
| 2024 | 62.51 % | +1.1% |
| 2025 | 62.61 % | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.9 % | 60 % | 64 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 66.8 % | 63 % | 71 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 63.45 % | 61.78 % | 69.77 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near World
- 10 United Republic of Tanzania 19 % compare
- 11 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
- 11 Syrian Arab Republic 0 % compare
More economy & growth data for World
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.23 Percent per annum (2028)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.11 Percent per annum (2028)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 1.49 trillion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0126 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 180.85 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.35 trillion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -14.25 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0114 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 163.93 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) 4.45 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in World was 62.61 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in World?
- The highest recorded value was 71 % in 2018.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in World?
- The lowest recorded value was 60 % in 2000.
- How does World rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- World ranks 11th out of 31 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in World?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this World data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.