2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa
Western Asia and Northern Africa: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 24.84 % in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa is 24.84 %, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and down 16.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa peaked at 35 % in 2003 and was at its lowest, 17.09 %, in 2000.
Western Asia and Northern Africa ranks 24th of 31 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 17.09 % | — |
| 2001 | 22.11 % | +29.4% |
| 2003 | 35 % | +58.3% |
| 2004 | 27 % | -22.9% |
| 2005 | 24 % | -11.1% |
| 2006 | 27 % | +12.5% |
| 2007 | 29 % | +7.4% |
| 2008 | 19 % | -34.5% |
| 2009 | 20 % | +5.3% |
| 2010 | 20 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 21 % | +5.0% |
| 2012 | 24 % | +14.3% |
| 2013 | 29.69 % | +23.7% |
| 2020 | 30.69 % | +3.4% |
| 2021 | 25.78 % | -16.0% |
| 2022 | 26.5 % | +2.8% |
| 2023 | 23.14 % | -12.7% |
| 2024 | 24.68 % | +6.7% |
| 2025 | 24.84 % | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.47 % | 17.09 % | 35 % | 9 |
| 2010s | 23.67 % | 20 % | 29.69 % | 4 |
| 2020s | 25.94 % | 23.14 % | 30.69 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Western Asia and Northern Africa
- 24 Denmark 96 % compare
- 24 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 96 % compare
- 24 New Zealand 96 % compare
- 27 Czechia 95 % compare
More economy & growth data for Western Asia and Northern Africa
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value 156 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value 105 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value 148 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value 372 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value 525 No (2025)
- 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value 576 No (2025)
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) 30.2 % (2023)
- 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value 11.5 % (2025)
- 15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International 21 No (2025)
- 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements 10,616 No (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Western Asia and Northern Africa was 24.84 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Western Asia and Northern Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 35 % in 2003.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Western Asia and Northern Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.09 % in 2000.
- How does Western Asia and Northern Africa rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Western Asia and Northern Africa ranks 24th out of 31 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Western Asia and Northern Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Western Asia and Northern Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.