2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe

Southern Europe: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 79 % in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
79 %
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
7th
of 31 groups
All-time high
80 %
in 2023
All-time low
72 %
in 2003
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe, 2000–2025

0204060802000201220252000: 74 %2001: 74 %2002: 73 %2003: 72 %2004: 75 %2005: 76 %2006: 76 %2007: 77 %2008: 76 %2009: 77 %2010: 72 %2011: 73 %2012: 76 %2013: 77 %2014: 77 %2015: 77 %2016: 77 %2017: 76 %2018: 79 %2019: 79 %2020: 78 %2021: 78 %2022: 79 %2023: 80 %2024: 79 %2025: 79 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2025, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe stood at 79 %.

That represents a change of up 2.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe peaked at 80 % in 2023 and was at its lowest, 72 %, in 2003.

Southern Europe ranks 7th of 31 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Southern Europe, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 74 %
2001 74 % +0.0%
2002 73 % -1.4%
2003 72 % -1.4%
2004 75 % +4.2%
2005 76 % +1.3%
2006 76 % +0.0%
2007 77 % +1.3%
2008 76 % -1.3%
2009 77 % +1.3%
2010 72 % -6.5%
2011 73 % +1.4%
2012 76 % +4.1%
2013 77 % +1.3%
2014 77 % +0.0%
2015 77 % +0.0%
2016 77 % +0.0%
2017 76 % -1.3%
2018 79 % +3.9%
2019 79 % +0.0%
2020 78 % -1.3%
2021 78 % +0.0%
2022 79 % +1.3%
2023 80 % +1.3%
2024 79 % -1.2%
2025 79 % +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 75 % 72 % 77 % 10
2010s 76.3 % 72 % 79 % 10
2020s 78.83 % 78 % 80 % 6

Countries ranked near Southern Europe

  1. 5 Türkiye 28 % compare
  2. 7 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 20 % compare
  3. 7 Viet Nam 20 % compare
  4. 10 United Republic of Tanzania 19 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Southern Europe

All data for Southern Europe →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe was 79 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Southern Europe?
The highest recorded value was 80 % in 2023.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Southern Europe?
The lowest recorded value was 72 % in 2003.
How does Southern Europe rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Southern Europe ranks 7th out of 31 groups with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Southern Europe?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Southern Europe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/southern-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/southern-europe/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Europe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.