2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia

Southern Asia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 20.08 % in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
20.08 %
Change on year
down 2.7%
Rank
26th
of 31 groups
All-time high
23 %
in 2000
All-time low
7 %
in 2002
Years of data
20
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia, 2000–2025

5101520252000201220252000: 23 %2001: 14 %2002: 7 %2003: 8 %2004: 13 %2005: 13 %2006: 13 %2007: 13 %2008: 14 %2009: 15 %2010: 20 %2011: 22 %2012: 20 %2013: 14 %2014: 12.6 %2015: 13.4 %2019: 20.9 %2023: 19.3 %2024: 20.6 %2025: 20.1 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Southern Asia recorded 20.08 % for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in 2025.

The figure is down 2.7% on the previous year and up 49.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia peaked at 23 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 7 %, in 2002.

That places Southern Asia 26th out of 31 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Southern Asia, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 23 %
2001 14 % -39.1%
2002 7 % -50.0%
2003 8 % +14.3%
2004 13 % +62.5%
2005 13 % +0.0%
2006 13 % +0.0%
2007 13 % +0.0%
2008 14 % +7.7%
2009 15 % +7.1%
2010 20 % +33.3%
2011 22 % +10.0%
2012 20 % -9.1%
2013 14 % -30.0%
2014 12.62 % -9.9%
2015 13.43 % +6.4%
2019 20.92 % +55.8%
2023 19.28 % -7.8%
2024 20.63 % +7.0%
2025 20.08 % -2.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 13.3 % 7 % 23 % 10
2010s 17.57 % 12.62 % 22 % 7
2020s 20 % 19.28 % 20.63 % 3

Countries ranked near Southern Asia

  1. 24 Denmark 96 % compare
  2. 24 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 96 % compare
  3. 24 New Zealand 96 % compare
  4. 27 Czechia 95 % compare
  5. 28 Republic of Korea 94 % compare
  6. 29 Côte d'Ivoire 0 %
  7. 29 Montenegro 92 % compare
  8. 29 Serbia 92 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Southern Asia

All data for Southern Asia →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia was 20.08 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Southern Asia?
The highest recorded value was 23 % in 2000.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Southern Asia?
The lowest recorded value was 7 % in 2002.
How does Southern Asia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Southern Asia ranks 26th out of 31 groups with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Southern Asia?
Over the last ten years it is up 49.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Southern Asia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/southern-asia/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Southern Asia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.