2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 45.45 % in 2010. ▬ Flat
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, 2002–2010
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand is 45.45 %, measured in 2010.
That represents a change of down 9.1% on the previous year and up 1.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand peaked at 53 % in 2004 and was at its lowest, 45 %, in 2002.
That places Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand 16th out of 31 groups with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 45 % | — |
| 2003 | 52.63 % | +17.0% |
| 2004 | 53 % | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 50 % | -5.7% |
| 2006 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 45.45 % | -9.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.08 % | 45 % | 53 % | 8 |
| 2010s | 45.45 % | 45.45 % | 45.45 % | 1 |
More economy & growth data for Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value 60 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value 60 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value 60 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value 64 No (2025)
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value 64 No (2025)
- 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value 64 No (2025)
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) 28.8 % (2023)
- 2.1.1 Prevalence of undernourishment — Value 24.8 % (2025)
- 15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International 9 No (2025)
- 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements 158 No (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand was 45.45 % in 2010, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 53 % in 2004.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 45 % in 2002.
- How does Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th out of 31 groups with data for 2010.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.