2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 29.46 % in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
29.46 %
Rank
20th
of 31 groups
All-time high
29.46 %
in 2024
All-time low
18 %
in 2005
Years of data
15
2000–2024

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2000–2024

01020302000201220242000: 24 %2001: 24 %2002: 25 %2003: 26 %2004: 19 %2005: 18 %2006: 19 %2007: 19 %2008: 18 %2009: 20 %2010: 20 %2011: 20 %2012: 23 %2013: 21.6 %2024: 29.5 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) recorded 29.46 % for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in 2024. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

That represents a change of up 36.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 29.46 % in 2024 and was at its lowest, 18 %, in 2005.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th of 31 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2000 to 2024.
Year % Change
2000 24 %
2001 24 % +0.0%
2002 25 % +4.2%
2003 26 % +4.0%
2004 19 % -26.9%
2005 18 % -5.3%
2006 19 % +5.6%
2007 19 % +0.0%
2008 18 % -5.3%
2009 20 % +11.1%
2010 20 % +0.0%
2011 20 % +0.0%
2012 23 % +15.0%
2013 21.62 % -6.0%
2024 29.46 % +36.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 21.2 % 18 % 26 % 10
2010s 21.16 % 20 % 23 % 4
2020s 29.46 % 29.46 % 29.46 % 1

More economy & growth data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 29.46 % in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 29.46 % in 2024.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was 18 % in 2005.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th out of 31 groups with data for 2024.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 36.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.