2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala
Guatemala: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 100 % in 2017. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala, 2000–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala is 100 %, measured in 2017. That is the highest value across all 18 years on record.
The figure is up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala peaked at 100 % in 2010 and was at its lowest, 50 %, in 2000.
Guatemala ranks 1st of 130 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 18 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 50 % | — |
| 2001 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 100 % | +100.0% |
| 2011 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 % | 50 % | 50 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 8 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 1 Algeria 100 % compare
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium 100 % compare
- 1 Botswana 100 % compare
- 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
- 1 Egypt 100 % compare
- 1 Estonia 100 % compare
- 1 Eswatini 100 % compare
- 1 Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
- 1 Madagascar 100 % compare
- 1 Malta 100 % compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
- 1 Namibia 100 % compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100 % compare
- 1 Niue 100 % compare
- 1 Paraguay 100 % compare
- 1 Peru 100 % compare
- 1 Republic of Moldova 75 % compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Tonga 100 % compare
- 2 Polynesia 40 % compare
- 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 33 % compare
- 3 Melanesia 33 % compare
More economy & growth data for Guatemala
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.43 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.86 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 865.22 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0076 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 47.01 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.85 billion BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 11.98 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0163 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 100.4 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 34.17 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Guatemala was 100 % in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2010.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 % in 2000.
- How does Guatemala rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Guatemala ranks 1st out of 130 countries with data for 2017.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.