2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 75 % in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
75 %
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
9th
of 31 groups
All-time high
85 %
in 2016
All-time low
55 %
in 2005
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe, 2000–2025

0204060802000201220252000: 80 %2001: 76 %2002: 75 %2003: 57 %2004: 57 %2005: 55 %2006: 59 %2007: 61 %2008: 65 %2009: 67 %2010: 70 %2011: 70 %2012: 71 %2013: 82 %2014: 80 %2015: 82 %2016: 85 %2017: 82 %2018: 82 %2019: 78 %2020: 76 %2021: 76 %2022: 77 %2023: 75 %2024: 75 %2025: 75 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Eastern Europe recorded 75 % for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 8.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe peaked at 85 % in 2016 and was at its lowest, 55 %, in 2005.

Eastern Europe ranks 9th of 31 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Eastern Europe, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 80 %
2001 76 % -5.0%
2002 75 % -1.3%
2003 57 % -24.0%
2004 57 % +0.0%
2005 55 % -3.5%
2006 59 % +7.3%
2007 61 % +3.4%
2008 65 % +6.6%
2009 67 % +3.1%
2010 70 % +4.5%
2011 70 % +0.0%
2012 71 % +1.4%
2013 82 % +15.5%
2014 80 % -2.4%
2015 82 % +2.5%
2016 85 % +3.7%
2017 82 % -3.5%
2018 82 % +0.0%
2019 78 % -4.9%
2020 76 % -2.6%
2021 76 % +0.0%
2022 77 % +1.3%
2023 75 % -2.6%
2024 75 % +0.0%
2025 75 % +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.2 % 55 % 80 % 10
2010s 78.2 % 70 % 85 % 10
2020s 75.67 % 75 % 77 % 6

Countries ranked near Eastern Europe

  1. 7 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 20 % compare
  2. 7 Viet Nam 20 % compare
  3. 10 United Republic of Tanzania 19 % compare
  4. 11 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 % compare
  5. 11 Syrian Arab Republic 0 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Eastern Europe

All data for Eastern Europe →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe was 75 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Eastern Europe?
The highest recorded value was 85 % in 2016.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Eastern Europe?
The lowest recorded value was 55 % in 2005.
How does Eastern Europe rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Eastern Europe ranks 9th out of 31 groups with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Eastern Europe?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Eastern Europe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/eastern-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/eastern-europe/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Eastern Europe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.