2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Uganda
Uganda: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 30 No in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Uganda, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Uganda stood at 30 No. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 66.7% on the previous year and up 57.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Uganda peaked at 30 No in 2025 and was at its lowest, 2 No, in 2000.
Uganda ranks 47th of 196 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Uganda, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2 No | — |
| 2001 | 3 No | +50.0% |
| 2002 | 2 No | -33.3% |
| 2003 | 2 No | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2 No | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 No | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 13 No | +550.0% |
| 2007 | 13 No | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 13 No | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 13 No | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 13 No | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 13 No | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 19 No | +46.2% |
| 2013 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 19 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 18 No | -5.3% |
| 2022 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 18 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 30 No | +66.7% |
Uganda compared with similar countries
- Uganda's 30 No is above the median for low income countries, which is 14 No, 2.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Uganda's 30 No is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 17 No, 1.8× the median. (43 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.5 No | 2 No | 13 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.8 No | 13 No | 19 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 20.17 No | 18 No | 30 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
More economy & growth data for Uganda
- Real gdp growth, annual growth rate 19.74 % change on previous year (2024)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.29 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.99 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate -31.39 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 2.4 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -34.66 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 1.76 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Uganda?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value in Uganda was 30 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 30 No in 2025.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 No in 2000.
- How does Uganda rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Uganda ranks 47th out of 196 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 57.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.