2.5.2 Number: Value, per unit of GDP … unit GDP not in Canada
Canada: 2.5.2 Number: Value, per unit of GDP … unit GDP not was 0 No per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per unit in Canada, 2000–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit in Canada stood at 0 No per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of down 2.1% on the previous year and down 34.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit in Canada peaked at 0 No per US$ of GDP in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 No per US$ of GDP, in 2005.
That places Canada 142nd out of 167 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number: Value, per unit of GDP … unit GDP not in Canada, year by year
| Year | No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2002 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2003 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2004 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 2005 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 2006 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +514.4% |
| 2007 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2008 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2009 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +11.6% |
| 2010 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 2011 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2012 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2013 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2014 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2015 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +15.3% |
| 2016 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 2017 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2018 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2019 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 2022 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2023 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2025 | 0 No per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
Canada compared with similar countries
- Canada's 0 No per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 No per US$ of GDP, 32% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 2.5.2 Number: Value, per unit of GDP … unit GDP not in Canada changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +514.4% | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Canada
More economy & growth data for Canada
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 0.8812 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.66 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0101 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 560.16 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -0.0258 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0073 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 409.02 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0048 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit in Canada?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit in Canada was 0 No per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per US$ of GDP in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per US$ of GDP in 2005.
- How does Canada rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit?
- Canada ranks 142nd out of 167 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.