2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita in Chile
Chile: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita was 0 No per person in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita in Chile, 2000–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per person.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0 No per person for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.5% on the previous year and down 8.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita in Chile peaked at 0 No per person in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 No per person, in 2005.
That places Chile 71st out of 167 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita in Chile, year by year
| Year | No per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per person | -1.1% |
| 2002 | 0 No per person | -1.1% |
| 2003 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2004 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2005 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2006 | 0 No per person | +494.2% |
| 2007 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2008 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2011 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2012 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 0 No per person | -0.9% |
| 2014 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2015 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2016 | 0 No per person | -1.2% |
| 2017 | 0 No per person | -1.6% |
| 2018 | 0 No per person | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 0 No per person | -1.6% |
| 2020 | 0 No per person | -0.9% |
| 2021 | 0 No per person | -0.4% |
| 2022 | 0 No per person | -0.5% |
| 2023 | 0 No per person | +0.6% |
| 2024 | 0 No per person | -0.5% |
| 2025 | 0 No per person | -0.5% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0 No per person is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 No per person, 59% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0 No per person is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 No per person, 65% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +494.2% | 0 No per person | 0 No per person |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More economy & growth data for Chile
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.32 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0096 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 173.59 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -3.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.007 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 126.75 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.11 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0049 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita in Chile?
- 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita in Chile was 0 No per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per person in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per person in 2005.
- How does Chile rank for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Chile ranks 71st out of 167 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.