2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in South-Eastern Asia
South-Eastern Asia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 319 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in South-Eastern Asia, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in South-Eastern Asia stood at 319 No. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
The figure is up 8.5% on the previous year and up 36.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in South-Eastern Asia peaked at 319 No in 2025 and was at its lowest, 8 No, in 2000.
South-Eastern Asia ranks 13th of 32 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in South-Eastern Asia, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 8 No | — |
| 2001 | 14 No | +75.0% |
| 2002 | 18 No | +28.6% |
| 2003 | 27 No | +50.0% |
| 2004 | 37 No | +37.0% |
| 2005 | 48 No | +29.7% |
| 2006 | 229 No | +377.1% |
| 2007 | 279 No | +21.8% |
| 2008 | 272 No | -2.5% |
| 2009 | 270 No | -0.7% |
| 2010 | 236 No | -12.6% |
| 2011 | 223 No | -5.5% |
| 2012 | 230 No | +3.1% |
| 2013 | 231 No | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 231 No | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 233 No | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 233 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 232 No | -0.4% |
| 2018 | 231 No | -0.4% |
| 2019 | 235 No | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 272 No | +15.7% |
| 2021 | 291 No | +7.0% |
| 2022 | 296 No | +1.7% |
| 2023 | 291 No | -1.7% |
| 2024 | 294 No | +1.0% |
| 2025 | 319 No | +8.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 120.2 No | 8 No | 279 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 231.5 No | 223 No | 236 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 293.83 No | 272 No | 319 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near South-Eastern Asia
- 10 Democratic Republic of the Congo 25 No compare
- 10 Kazakhstan 75 No compare
- 11 Egypt 62 No compare
- 12 Belgium 58 No compare
- 13 Mali 57 No compare
- 14 Azerbaijan 52 No compare
- 15 Spain 50 No compare
- 16 Bangladesh 48 No compare
- 16 Japan 48 No compare
More economy & growth data for South-Eastern Asia
- Gross Domestic Product, GDP in millions constant 2021 international $ 12.32 million (2027)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 3.92 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 25.71 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 5,643 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita, 2015 prices 5,103 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices 3.55 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ 3.47 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita 2.72 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 2.46 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 27.24 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in South-Eastern Asia?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in South-Eastern Asia was 319 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in South-Eastern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 319 No in 2025.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in South-Eastern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 8 No in 2000.
- How does South-Eastern Asia rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- South-Eastern Asia ranks 13th out of 32 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in South-Eastern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this South-Eastern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.