2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Lesotho
Lesotho: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 9 No in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Lesotho, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Lesotho stood at 9 No.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Lesotho peaked at 10 No in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0 No, in 2000.
That places Lesotho 86th out of 174 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Lesotho, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No | — |
| 2001 | 0 No | — |
| 2002 | 0 No | — |
| 2003 | 0 No | — |
| 2004 | 1 No | — |
| 2005 | 1 No | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 9 No | +800.0% |
| 2007 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 10 No | +11.1% |
| 2016 | 10 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 10 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 10 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 10 No | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 10 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 10 No | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 9 No | -10.0% |
| 2023 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 9 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 9 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 No | 0 No | 9 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.5 No | 9 No | 10 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.33 No | 9 No | 10 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lesotho
- 86 Central African Republic 9 No compare
- 86 Haiti 9 No compare
- 86 Nicaragua 9 No compare
- 86 Papua New Guinea 9 No compare
- 86 Saudi Arabia 9 No compare
- 86 Senegal 9 No compare
More economy & growth data for Lesotho
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), annual growth 6.47 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per unit of GDP 15.61 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per capita 16,996 current LCU per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual 2.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit 0.8589 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per 935.36 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), annual growth 2.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of 7.88 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per capita 8,578 constant LCU per person (2025)
- GDP (current US$), annual growth rate 7.62 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Lesotho?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Lesotho was 9 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Lesotho?
- The highest recorded value was 10 No in 2015.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Lesotho?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No in 2000.
- How does Lesotho rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Lesotho ranks 86th out of 174 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Lesotho?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lesotho data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.