2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Australia and New Zealand
Australia and New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value was 23 No in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
Australia and New Zealand recorded 23 No for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in 2025.
The figure is down 63.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 69 No in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 No, in 2000.
That places Australia and New Zealand 34th out of 174 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value in Australia and New Zealand, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No | — |
| 2001 | 0 No | — |
| 2002 | 2 No | — |
| 2003 | 11 No | +450.0% |
| 2004 | 11 No | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 9 No | -18.2% |
| 2006 | 63 No | +600.0% |
| 2007 | 63 No | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 63 No | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 61 No | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 61 No | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 61 No | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 61 No | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 61 No | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 63 No | +3.3% |
| 2015 | 63 No | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 63 No | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 63 No | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 63 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 65 No | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 69 No | +6.2% |
| 2021 | 56 No | -18.8% |
| 2022 | 23 No | -58.9% |
| 2023 | 23 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 23 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 23 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.3 No | 0 No | 63 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 62.4 No | 61 No | 65 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 36.17 No | 23 No | 69 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand
- 31 Germany 30 No compare
- 31 Kenya 30 No compare
- 32 Côte d'Ivoire 11 No compare
- 33 Kyrgyzstan 26 No compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 23 No compare
- 34 Jordan 23 No compare
- 34 Namibia 23 No compare
- 34 Tajikistan 23 No compare
More economy & growth data for Australia and New Zealand
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 26.13 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$, 2015 prices 4.44 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 7.42 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 2.09 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 65,559 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita, 2015 prices 54,411 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices 1.74 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ 3.22 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices 116.66 USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 453,936 million USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Australia and New Zealand?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value in Australia and New Zealand was 23 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 69 No in 2020.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No in 2000.
- How does Australia and New Zealand rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th out of 174 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value rising or falling in Australia and New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 63.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.