2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per in Zimbabwe, 2000–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zimbabwe is 0 No per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zimbabwe peaked at 0 No per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 No per square kilometre, in 2000.
Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 162 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2002 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0 No per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2007 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0001 No per square kilometre, 13% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 No per square kilometre, 24% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More economy & growth data for Zimbabwe
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.02 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 139.91 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 0.1973 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate 128.46 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 0.1441 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0189 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zimbabwe?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zimbabwe was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 133rd out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.