2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square in Zambia
Zambia: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per in Zambia, 2000–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per square kilometre.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 0 No per square kilometre for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zambia peaked at 0 No per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0 No per square kilometre, in 2000.
Zambia ranks 120th of 162 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square in Zambia, year by year
| Year | No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2002 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2004 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2005 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0 No per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 2010 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Zambia compared with similar countries
- Zambia's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0001 No per square kilometre, 26% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Zambia's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 No per square kilometre, 46% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
More economy & growth data for Zambia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.31 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 4.92 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 13.19 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.1053 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 138.75 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate 7.79 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0769 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 101.32 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0464 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zambia?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Zambia was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Zambia rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?
- Zambia ranks 120th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.