2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita in New Zealand
New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita was 0 No per person in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per in New Zealand, 2000–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in New Zealand is 0 No per person, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 13.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in New Zealand peaked at 0 No per person in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 No per person, in 2000.
That places New Zealand 54th out of 164 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | No per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2002 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2003 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2004 | 0 No per person | -1.5% |
| 2005 | 0 No per person | -1.1% |
| 2006 | 0 No per person | +97.6% |
| 2007 | 0 No per person | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 0 No per person | -0.8% |
| 2009 | 0 No per person | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0 No per person | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 0 No per person | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0 No per person | -0.5% |
| 2013 | 0 No per person | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0 No per person | -1.6% |
| 2015 | 0 No per person | -2.0% |
| 2016 | 0 No per person | -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0 No per person | -2.1% |
| 2018 | 0 No per person | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 0 No per person | -1.4% |
| 2020 | 0 No per person | -2.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per person | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 0 No per person | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 0 No per person | -2.3% |
| 2024 | 0 No per person | -1.7% |
| 2025 | 0 No per person | -0.7% |
New Zealand compared with similar countries
- New Zealand's 0 No per person is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 No per person, 2.5× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- New Zealand's 0 No per person is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 No per person, 1.5× the median. (20 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita in New Zealand changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +97.6% | 0 No per person | 0 No per person |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 6 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
More economy & growth data for New Zealand
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.71 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.37 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.11 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0111 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 552.02 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -0.8628 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0081 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 403.08 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.49 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0049 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in New Zealand?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in New Zealand was 0 No per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per person in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per person in 2000.
- How does New Zealand rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?
- New Zealand ranks 54th out of 164 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.