2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita in Mauritius
Mauritius: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita was 0 No per person in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per in Mauritius, 2000–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per person.
Analysis
In 2025, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Mauritius stood at 0 No per person. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 52.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Mauritius peaked at 0 No per person in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0 No per person, in 2000.
That places Mauritius 41st out of 164 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | No per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2002 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2003 | 0 No per person | — |
| 2004 | 0 No per person | -0.6% |
| 2005 | 0 No per person | -0.6% |
| 2006 | 0 No per person | +397.7% |
| 2007 | 0 No per person | -0.5% |
| 2008 | 0 No per person | -0.4% |
| 2009 | 0 No per person | -20.2% |
| 2010 | 0 No per person | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 0 No per person | -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0 No per person | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 0 No per person | -0.2% |
| 2014 | 0 No per person | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0 No per person | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 0 No per person | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 0 No per person | -0.1% |
| 2018 | 0 No per person | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 0 No per person | +25.0% |
| 2020 | 0 No per person | -0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per person | -0.0% |
| 2022 | 0 No per person | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 0 No per person | +21.3% |
| 2024 | 0 No per person | +0.2% |
| 2025 | 0 No per person | +0.2% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 0 No per person is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 No per person, 3.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 0 No per person is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 No per person, 7.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita in Mauritius changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +397.7% | 0 No per person | 0 No per person |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
More economy & growth data for Mauritius
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.31 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.33 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 3.6 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0185 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 240.79 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -1.35 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0135 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 175.82 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.2 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0089 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Mauritius?
- 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per in Mauritius was 0 No per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per person in 2025.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per person in 2000.
- How does Mauritius rank for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?
- Mauritius ranks 41st out of 164 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is up 52.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.