2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) in Kazakhstan, 2000–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) in Kazakhstan is 0 No per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.
That represents a change of up 77.8% on the previous year and up 77.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 No per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 No per square kilometre, in 2000.
Kazakhstan ranks 149th of 165 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.
2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 No per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0 No per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 2007 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0 No per square kilometre | +77.8% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0002 No per square kilometre, 9% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0 No per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0004 No per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More economy & growth data for Kazakhstan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.35 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.38 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0067 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 97.71 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate 0.4404 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0049 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 71.35 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0043 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) in Kazakhstan?
- 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) in Kazakhstan was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 No per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 149th out of 165 countries with data for 2023.
- Is 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 77.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.