15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Viet Nam
Viet Nam: 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements was 422 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Viet Nam, 2012–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
Viet Nam recorded 422 No for 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in 2025. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 90.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Viet Nam peaked at 422 No in 2025 and was at its lowest, 105 No, in 2012.
Viet Nam ranks 8th of 22 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Viet Nam, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 105 No | — |
| 2013 | 145 No | +38.1% |
| 2014 | 202 No | +39.3% |
| 2015 | 222 No | +9.9% |
| 2016 | 247 No | +11.3% |
| 2017 | 276 No | +11.7% |
| 2018 | 304 No | +10.1% |
| 2019 | 324 No | +6.6% |
| 2020 | 343 No | +5.9% |
| 2021 | 368 No | +7.3% |
| 2022 | 395 No | +7.3% |
| 2023 | 411 No | +4.1% |
| 2024 | 420 No | +2.2% |
| 2025 | 422 No | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 228.12 No | 105 No | 324 No | 8 |
| 2020s | 393.17 No | 343 No | 422 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Viet Nam
- 5 Mexico 4,234 No compare
- 5 Syrian Arab Republic 975 No compare
- 6 Spain 3,076 No compare
- 7 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 2,896 No compare
- 7 United Republic of Tanzania 519 No compare
- 8 Canada 2,515 No compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 372 No compare
- 9 China, mainland 2,334 No compare
- 10 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2,282 No compare
- 11 Democratic Republic of the Congo 107 No compare
- 11 Kenya 2,148 No compare
- 11 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 107 No compare
More economy & growth data for Viet Nam
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 5.99 Percent per annum (2029)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices 404,124 million USD (2024)
- GDP Deflator — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices 130.03 SLC (2024)
- GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices 112.67 USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local 122.82 SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices 106.42 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 455,329 million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 4,509 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita, 2015 prices 4,002 USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Viet Nam?
- 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Viet Nam was 422 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements recorded in Viet Nam?
- The highest recorded value was 422 No in 2025.
- What is the lowest 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements recorded in Viet Nam?
- The lowest recorded value was 105 No in 2012.
- How does Viet Nam rank for 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements?
- Viet Nam ranks 8th out of 22 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements rising or falling in Viet Nam?
- Over the last ten years it is up 90.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.