15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Republic of Moldova
Republic of Moldova: 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements was 34 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Republic of Moldova, 2012–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
Republic of Moldova recorded 34 No for 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in 2025. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
The figure is up 30.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Republic of Moldova peaked at 34 No in 2021 and was at its lowest, 22 No, in 2012.
Republic of Moldova ranks 17th of 22 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Republic of Moldova, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 22 No | — |
| 2013 | 24 No | +9.1% |
| 2014 | 25 No | +4.2% |
| 2015 | 26 No | +4.0% |
| 2016 | 27 No | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 29 No | +7.4% |
| 2018 | 29 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 30 No | +3.4% |
| 2020 | 30 No | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 34 No | +13.3% |
| 2022 | 34 No | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 34 No | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 34 No | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 34 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.5 No | 22 No | 30 No | 8 |
| 2020s | 33.33 No | 30 No | 34 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova
- 14 Ethiopia 1,905 No compare
- 14 Lao People's Democratic Republic 90 No compare
- 15 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 58 No compare
- 15 Japan 1,845 No compare
- 16 Colombia 1,789 No compare
- 16 Polynesia 39 No compare
- 17 Pakistan 1,776 No compare
- 18 Nigeria 1,536 No compare
- 18 Micronesia 23 No compare
- 19 Sweden 1,438 No compare
- 19 Timor-Leste 12 No compare
- 20 Micronesia (Federated States of) 4 No compare
- 20 Switzerland 1,398 No compare
More economy & growth data for Republic of Moldova
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency 68,756 million SLC (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita, 2015 prices 1.16 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$, 2015 prices 7.96 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 12.7 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local 7.96 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local Currency 9.69 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP Standard Local Currency 4.42 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ 3,889 million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 7,677 million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 4.42 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Republic of Moldova?
- 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Republic of Moldova was 34 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 34 No in 2021.
- What is the lowest 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 22 No in 2012.
- How does Republic of Moldova rank for 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 17th out of 22 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.