15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Middle Africa
Middle Africa: 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements was 286 No in 2025. ▲ Rising
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Middle Africa, 2012–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.
Analysis
In 2025, 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Middle Africa stood at 286 No. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
The figure is up 54.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Middle Africa peaked at 286 No in 2024 and was at its lowest, 109 No, in 2012.
Middle Africa ranks 10th of 22 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements in Middle Africa, year by year
| Year | No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 109 No | — |
| 2013 | 135 No | +23.9% |
| 2014 | 170 No | +25.9% |
| 2015 | 185 No | +8.8% |
| 2016 | 200 No | +8.1% |
| 2017 | 208 No | +4.0% |
| 2018 | 219 No | +5.3% |
| 2019 | 241 No | +10.0% |
| 2020 | 252 No | +4.6% |
| 2021 | 257 No | +2.0% |
| 2022 | 278 No | +8.2% |
| 2023 | 285 No | +2.5% |
| 2024 | 286 No | +0.4% |
| 2025 | 286 No | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 183.38 No | 109 No | 241 No | 8 |
| 2020s | 274 No | 252 No | 286 No | 6 |
Countries ranked near Middle Africa
- 7 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 2,896 No compare
- 7 United Republic of Tanzania 519 No compare
- 8 Canada 2,515 No compare
- 8 Viet Nam 422 No compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 372 No compare
- 9 China, mainland 2,334 No compare
- 10 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2,282 No compare
- 11 Democratic Republic of the Congo 107 No compare
- 11 Kenya 2,148 No compare
- 11 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 107 No compare
- 12 Philippines 2,035 No compare
- 13 Belgium 1,975 No compare
- 13 Melanesia 96 No compare
More economy & growth data for Middle Africa
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$, 2015 prices 4.45 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 8.92 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 44.6 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 20.09 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 122,785 million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ 57,522 million USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita, 2015 prices 1.12 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita, 2015 prices 1,293 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ per capita 1,345 USD (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ 286,309 million USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Middle Africa?
- 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements in Middle Africa was 286 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements recorded in Middle Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 286 No in 2024.
- What is the lowest 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements recorded in Middle Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 109 No in 2012.
- How does Middle Africa rank for 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements?
- Middle Africa ranks 10th out of 22 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements rising or falling in Middle Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Middle Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.