Statizoid

15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International in Namibia

Namibia: 15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International was 1 No in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
1 No
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 233 countries
All-time high
1 No
in 2012
All-time low
1 No
in 2012
Years of data
14
2012–2025

15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International in Namibia, 2012–2025

00.20.40.60.812012201820252012: 1 No2013: 1 No2014: 1 No2015: 1 No2016: 1 No2017: 1 No2018: 1 No2019: 1 No2020: 1 No2021: 1 No2022: 1 No2023: 1 No2024: 1 No2025: 1 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international in Namibia is 1 No, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international in Namibia peaked at 1 No in 2012 and was at its lowest, 1 No, in 2012.

Namibia ranks 1st of 233 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International in Namibia, year by year

Year No Change
2012 1 No —
2013 1 No +0.0%
2014 1 No +0.0%
2015 1 No +0.0%
2016 1 No +0.0%
2017 1 No +0.0%
2018 1 No +0.0%
2019 1 No +0.0%
2020 1 No +0.0%
2021 1 No +0.0%
2022 1 No +0.0%
2023 1 No +0.0%
2024 1 No +0.0%
2025 1 No +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 1 No 1 No 1 No 8
2020s 1 No 1 No 1 No 6

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 1 Afghanistan 1 No compare
  2. 1 Albania 1 No compare
  3. 1 Algeria 1 No compare
  4. 1 Angola 1 No compare
  5. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 No compare
  6. 1 Argentina 1 No compare
  7. 1 Armenia 1 No compare
  8. 1 Australia 1 No compare
  9. 1 Austria 1 No compare
  10. 1 Bahrain 1 No compare
  11. 1 Bangladesh 1 No compare
  12. 1 Barbados 1 No compare
  13. 1 Belgium 1 No compare
  14. 1 Benin 1 No compare
  15. 1 Bhutan 1 No compare
  16. 1 Brazil 1 No compare
  17. 1 Bulgaria 1 No compare
  18. 1 Burkina Faso 1 No compare
  19. 1 Burundi 1 No compare
  20. 1 Cambodia 1 No compare
  21. 1 Cameroon 1 No compare
  22. 1 Canada 1 No compare
  23. 1 Central African Republic 1 No compare
  24. 1 Chad 1 No compare
  25. 1 Chile 1 No compare
  26. 1 Colombia 1 No compare
  27. 1 Congo 1 No compare
  28. 1 Cook Islands 1 No compare
  29. 1 Costa Rica 1 No compare
  30. 1 Croatia 1 No compare
  31. 1 Cuba 1 No compare
  32. 1 Cyprus 1 No compare
  33. 1 Czechia 1 No compare
  34. 1 Denmark 1 No compare
  35. 1 Djibouti 1 No compare
  36. 1 Dominican Republic 1 No compare
  37. 1 Ecuador 1 No compare
  38. 1 Egypt 1 No compare
  39. 1 El Salvador 1 No compare
  40. 1 Eritrea 1 No compare
  41. 1 Estonia 1 No compare
  42. 1 Eswatini 1 No compare
  43. 1 Ethiopia 1 No compare
  44. 1 Fiji 1 No compare
  45. 1 Finland 1 No compare
  46. 1 France 1 No compare
  47. 1 Gabon 1 No compare
  48. 1 Georgia 1 No compare
  49. 1 Germany 1 No compare
  50. 1 Ghana 1 No compare
  51. 1 Greece 1 No compare
  52. 1 Guatemala 1 No compare
  53. 1 Guinea 1 No compare
  54. 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 No compare
  55. 1 Guyana 1 No compare
  56. 1 Honduras 1 No compare
  57. 1 Hungary 1 No compare
  58. 1 Iceland 1 No compare
  59. 1 India 1 No compare
  60. 1 Indonesia 1 No compare
  61. 1 Iraq 1 No compare
  62. 1 Ireland 1 No compare
  63. 1 Italy 1 No compare
  64. 1 Jamaica 1 No compare
  65. 1 Japan 1 No compare
  66. 1 Jordan 1 No compare
  67. 1 Kenya 1 No compare
  68. 1 Kiribati 1 No compare
  69. 1 Kuwait 1 No compare
  70. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 No compare
  71. 1 Latvia 1 No compare
  72. 1 Lebanon 1 No compare
  73. 1 Lesotho 1 No compare
  74. 1 Liberia 1 No compare
  75. 1 Libya 1 No compare
  76. 1 Lithuania 1 No compare
  77. 1 Luxembourg 1 No compare
  78. 1 Madagascar 1 No compare
  79. 1 Malawi 1 No compare
  80. 1 Malaysia 1 No compare
  81. 1 Maldives 1 No compare
  82. 1 Mali 1 No compare
  83. 1 Malta 1 No compare
  84. 1 Marshall Islands 1 No compare
  85. 1 Mauritania 1 No compare
  86. 1 Mauritius 1 No compare
  87. 1 Mongolia 1 No compare
  88. 1 Montenegro 1 No compare
  89. 1 Morocco 1 No compare
  90. 1 Mozambique 1 No compare
  91. 1 Myanmar 1 No compare
  92. 1 Nepal 1 No compare
  93. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 1 No compare
  94. 1 Nicaragua 1 No compare
  95. 1 Niger 1 No compare
  96. 1 Nigeria 1 No compare
  97. 1 Norway 1 No compare
  98. 1 Oman 1 No compare
  99. 1 Pakistan 1 No compare
  100. 1 Palau 1 No compare
  101. 1 Panama 1 No compare
  102. 1 Papua New Guinea 1 No compare
  103. 1 Paraguay 1 No compare
  104. 1 Peru 1 No compare
  105. 1 Philippines 1 No compare
  106. 1 Poland 1 No compare
  107. 1 Portugal 1 No compare
  108. 1 Qatar 1 No compare
  109. 1 Republic of Korea 1 No compare
  110. 1 Romania 1 No compare
  111. 1 Rwanda 1 No compare
  112. 1 Saint Lucia 1 No compare
  113. 1 Samoa 1 No compare
  114. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 No compare
  115. 1 Saudi Arabia 1 No compare
  116. 1 Senegal 1 No compare
  117. 1 Serbia 1 No compare
  118. 1 Seychelles 1 No compare
  119. 1 Sierra Leone 1 No compare
  120. 1 Slovakia 1 No compare
  121. 1 Slovenia 1 No compare
  122. 1 Somalia 1 No compare
  123. 1 South Africa 1 No compare
  124. 1 South Sudan 1 No compare
  125. 1 Spain 1 No compare
  126. 1 Sri Lanka 1 No compare
  127. 1 Sudan 1 No compare
  128. 1 Sweden 1 No compare
  129. 1 Switzerland 1 No compare
  130. 1 Togo 1 No compare
  131. 1 Tonga 1 No compare
  132. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 No compare
  133. 1 Tunisia 1 No compare
  134. 1 Tuvalu 1 No compare
  135. 1 Uganda 1 No compare
  136. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 No compare
  137. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 No compare
  138. 1 Uruguay 1 No compare
  139. 1 Yemen 1 No compare
  140. 1 Zambia 1 No compare
  141. 1 Zimbabwe 1 No compare
  142. 1 Australia and New Zealand 1 No compare

See the full ranking of 288 places →

More economy & growth data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international in Namibia?
15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international in Namibia was 1 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 1 No in 2012.
What is the lowest 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 1 No in 2012.
How does Namibia rank for 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international?
Namibia ranks 1st out of 233 countries with data for 2025.
Is 15.6.1 countries that are contracting parties to the international rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International in Namibia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/15-6-1-countries-that-are-contracting-parties-to-the-international-treaty-on-pgrfa-value/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/15-6-1-countries-that-are-contracting-parties-to-the-international-treaty-on-pgrfa-value/namibia/">15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International in Namibia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.6.1 Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
288 places, 4,030 data points, 2012–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.