What is the difference in wholesale and retail trade, value added between Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia?

15.23 billion constant LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia?

9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.

Where does this data come from?

World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Wholesale and retail trade, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Ethiopia: Wholesale and retail trade, value added

Equatorial Guinea

40.86 billion constant LCU

in 2008

Ethiopia

25.64 billion constant LCU

in 2011

Equatorial Guinea rank

23rd

Ethiopia rank

25th

Wholesale and retail trade, value added over time

Equatorial Guinea
Ethiopia

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 40.86 billion constant LCU against 25.64 billion constant LCU in Ethiopia, a difference of 15.23 billion constant LCU.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd and Ethiopia ranks 25th of 37 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wholesale and retail trade, value added, Equatorial Guinea or Ethiopia?: Equatorial Guinea, at 40.86 billion constant LCU against 25.64 billion constant LCU in Ethiopia as of 2008.
What is the difference in wholesale and retail trade, value added between Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia?: 15.23 billion constant LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia?: 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia rank globally for wholesale and retail trade, value added?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd and Ethiopia ranks 25th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Wholesale and retail trade, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Ethiopia: Wholesale and retail trade, value added. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/wholesale-and-retail-trade-value-added-constant-lcu/equatorial-guinea/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/wholesale-and-retail-trade-value-added-constant-lcu/equatorial-guinea/ethiopia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Ethiopia: Wholesale and retail trade, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Wholesale and retail trade, value added (constant LCU)
Unit: constant LCU
Source: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 37 places, 834 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Value added in trade is defined as the value of output of the trade industry less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Trade is a subset of services, comprising wholesale and retail trade, and hotel and restaurants (ISIC 50-55). Data are in constant local currency.