Comoros vs Namibia: Wholesale and retail trade, value added
Comoros
17.33 billion constant LCU
in 1998
Namibia
7.95 billion constant LCU
in 2011
Comoros rank
27th
Namibia rank
29th
Wholesale and retail trade, value added over time
- Comoros
- Namibia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 17.33 billion constant LCU against 7.95 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 9.39 billion constant LCU.
That makes Comoros's figure about 2.2 times Namibia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 29th of 37 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wholesale and retail trade, value added, Comoros or Namibia?
- Comoros, at 17.33 billion constant LCU against 7.95 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 1998.
- What is the difference in wholesale and retail trade, value added between Comoros and Namibia?
- 9.39 billion constant LCU, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1998.
- How do Comoros and Namibia rank globally for wholesale and retail trade, value added?
- Comoros ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Wholesale and retail trade, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value added in trade is defined as the value of output of the trade industry less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Trade is a subset of services, comprising wholesale and retail trade, and hotel and restaurants (ISIC 50-55). Data are in constant local currency.