Cabo Verde vs Rwanda: Vulnerability score, Water
Vulnerability score, Water over time
- Cabo Verde
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 0.3725 against 0.3646 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0079.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Rwanda ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 73rd and Rwanda ranks 76th of 170 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3409 | 0.3635 | 0.0226 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.3775 | 0.3646 | 0.0129 | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, water, Cabo Verde or Rwanda?
- Cabo Verde, at 0.3725 against 0.3646 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, water between Cabo Verde and Rwanda?
- 0.0079, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cabo Verde and Rwanda rank globally for vulnerability score, water?
- Cabo Verde ranks 73rd and Rwanda ranks 76th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.