Libya vs Malta: Vulnerability score, Sensitivity
Vulnerability score, Sensitivity over time
- Libya
- Malta
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.3607 against 0.3566 in Malta, a difference of 0.0041.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 57th and Malta ranks 60th of 182 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.375 | 0.3621 | 0.0128 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.361 | 0.357 | 0.004 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, sensitivity, Libya or Malta?
- Libya, at 0.3607 against 0.3566 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, sensitivity between Libya and Malta?
- 0.0041, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Malta rank globally for vulnerability score, sensitivity?
- Libya ranks 57th and Malta ranks 60th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Sensitivity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.