Chile vs Paraguay: Vulnerability score, Sensitivity
Vulnerability score, Sensitivity over time
- Chile
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.2322 against 0.2314 in Chile, a difference of 0.0008.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Paraguay ahead.
Chile ranks 161st and Paraguay ranks 160th of 182 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2332 | 0.2318 | 0.0014 | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.2335 | 0.2328 | 0.0007 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, sensitivity, Chile or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.2322 against 0.2314 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, sensitivity between Chile and Paraguay?
- 0.0008, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for vulnerability score, sensitivity?
- Chile ranks 161st and Paraguay ranks 160th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Sensitivity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.