Gabon vs Jamaica: Vulnerability score, Heath
Vulnerability score, Heath over time
- Gabon
- Jamaica
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 0.4977 against 0.489 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0087.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Jamaica ahead.
Gabon ranks 74th and Jamaica ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4739 | 0.4883 | 0.0144 | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0.5062 | 0.4896 | 0.0166 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, heath, Gabon or Jamaica?
- Gabon, at 0.4977 against 0.489 in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, heath between Gabon and Jamaica?
- 0.0087, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Jamaica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Gabon and Jamaica rank globally for vulnerability score, heath?
- Gabon ranks 74th and Jamaica ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Heath. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.