Cuba vs Romania: Vulnerability score, Heath
Vulnerability score, Heath over time
- Cuba
- Romania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.3072 against 0.2948 in Romania, a difference of 0.0124.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Romania ahead.
Cuba ranks 150th and Romania ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3103 | 0.3272 | 0.0168 | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.3076 | 0.3005 | 0.0071 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, heath, Cuba or Romania?
- Cuba, at 0.3072 against 0.2948 in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, heath between Cuba and Romania?
- 0.0124, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Romania rank globally for vulnerability score, heath?
- Cuba ranks 150th and Romania ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Heath. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.