Congo vs Eswatini: Vulnerability score, Heath
Vulnerability score, Heath over time
- Congo
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.582 against 0.5818 in Congo, a difference of 0.0002.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 55th and Eswatini ranks 54th of 190 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5456 | 0.5822 | 0.0365 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.5659 | 0.5706 | 0.0047 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, heath, Congo or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.582 against 0.5818 in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, heath between Congo and Eswatini?
- 0.0002, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for vulnerability score, heath?
- Congo ranks 55th and Eswatini ranks 54th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Heath. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.